Back in 1961, Bo Diddley
sang "I look like a farmer but I'm a lover" in the song You
Can't Judge a Book by its Cover. At the same time, somewhere in
Italy, an employee of Moto Guzzi was probably assembling the father
of the motor that now lives in the California Stone. A bike, that on
initial viewing, looks like it's not going to do anything well. But
don't judge a book by its cover.
The California Stone is
basically a rebadged Jackal with a makeover. Power is provided by a
1064 cc, transverse (from left to right instead of front to back) v-twin
motor. You could say it defines Moto Guzzi - originating in the 50s
when it was used to power 3-wheeled military vehicles, it still remains
the Guzzi cornerstone, even as they celebrate their 80th anniversary
this year.
An obvious feature when you
first look at it, is its matte finish of Porphyry Grey - Porphyry being
a type of rock (and hard to pronounce). Actually the colour options
also include Slate Black, Flint Orange and Limestone White - thereby
all cleverly following the Stone theme, even if they did just add a
stone type in front of the colour. The finish gives the bike a suede
look, last seen on 1950 Mercury lead sleds, but gaining popularity again
on motorcycles today. Guzzi compliment this finish with a brushed-down
effect on the polished surfaces of the pipes and gas cap.
As installed in the California
Stone, the motor kicks out 74hp at 6400rpm, with a peak torque of 70ft/lbs
at 5000rpm. What that really means is a motor that will lay some whoop
ass on most non power-cruisers. Cracking the throttle from idle, I felt
eighteen again, as the bike twisted to the right like a big block in
a '66 Chevy. Ah yes, those were the days. 'Born to Run' blasting on
the 8-track - blissfully ignorant of how cruel the world really is
or
some similar analogy.
However, surprisingly it
doesn't have gobs of low end, but more of a muscular midrange that hits
with a solid "BWAHHHH" from the airbox. Oh man, this thing
sounds good on the pipe! I rode the Stone like a hooligan most of the
time, just to get that pull on the bars and that great sound - I just
couldn't help myself.
While power can still be
had in the upper revs, it does tail off a tad quickly. I had to work
really hard to hit the rev limiter which, once hit, left the Stone crying
death and spitting out a load of sparks from the pipe, sufficient to
scare off woodland creatures for some distance. Excellent!
The fuel injection system
didn't falter at any throttle opening or closing. However, starting
in zero degree weather required a few attempts before the beast would
snort into life. I think this was the Stone's way of warning me that
it's too damn cold to ride today.
The Stone's mill is coupled
to a reworked five speed gearbox. Its claimed new attributes being much
smoother, and quieter shifting. I can't argue with that claim - going
from neutral to first was much quieter than the last three cruisers
I tested, and all up-shifts were quiet and sure. But, (there's always
a but) I found false neutrals several times when shifting back down.
Especially between 5th and 4th and even more so between 3rd and 2nd
(although they were found smoothly and quietly, I might add!).
Fifth gear is tall enough
to be a pseudo overdrive. It gave the Stone a very long legged feeling,
although required downshifting to fourth for quick highway passing.
Or maybe it was just my subconscious wanting to wring the motor out
another time.
Power is transferred to
the rear wheel by the standard Guzzi shaft drive. It didn't influence
the ride to any great extent, except on the missed downshifts, which
would result in the bike giving a weird kind of twist to embarrass the
author.
With the across-the-frame
V configuration, the bike feels quite narrow when seated. Despite being
541lbs (30lbs heavier than the Vulcan and Spirit that we tested recently),
it doesn't feel heavy at low or higher speed.
Seat height is a lowish 737
mm (29") which is in the cruiser ballpark. With an overall length
of 1560 mm (61.4"), and a rake of only 28 degrees, you have the
ingredients for a much better handling cruiser than most of the standard
offerings.
The frame looks kind of
dainty in a spindly sort of way, which may explain a slight unease in
the bike when navigating those all too frequent pavement ruts that follow
the direction of travel.
Thankfully, the Stone is
very agreeable at corners with ample clearance, thereby avoiding that
cruiser tradition of being wrenched out of your riding bliss by grinding
pegs and a shower of sparks. To keep the front end compliant, a steering
damper is stock fitting, although it wasn't keeping all the oil inside.
Overall riding comfort was
good. The seat is wide and decently padded. The rear suspension, described
imaginatively in the Guzzi specs as a 'swing arm with two hydraulic
shock absorbers', gave a smooth ride over the spots where other cruisers
punished my spine. Black finished 45mm forks damp the front end.
On the control side, the
levers, grips and switchgear are of good quality, although clutch action
is heavy and a lot of stop and go' riding cramped my left hand
a bit. The speedo didn't quite seem right - a crude comparison test
with a Ford F-150 as my speedo calibrating device, suggested the Guzzi's
might be up to 10km/h too high at 80km/h. It didn't return to zero mph
when stationary either.
Guzzi's claim a maximum
speed of 124mph (a tad under 200 km/h). On CMG's Plan B test facility
(funded largely by Ontario taxpayers), I got the likely inaccurate speedo
to 110 mph before fear, denial, anger and finally, compliance, kicked
in.
The heel/toe shifter required
too much thought when figuring which part to use, while wearing my usual
size 10 boots. When photographer Seck suggested I try a pair of his
size 11 boots, both toe and heel wedged perfectly in-between the shifter
parts, resulting in a desire to ride to a hardware store for a hacksaw
to adapt' the shifter back to a more conventional style.
So, it goes good and handles
well and I'm usually one to nit-pick so that brings us to?
..The
brakes. The single 320mm disk and four-piston Brembo caliper up front
has all the (in) sensitivity of Editor 'arris on deadline day.
Even though the good folks
at Bavarian Motosports bled them prior to my test ride, they required
some pulling to get to bite. Halfway to the bar though, and the brakes
started their job in earnest. I find that sometimes, that first half-inch
of movement feels a lot longer - spoken as a heterosexual male with
no innuendo I assure you.
The rear 282mm disk with
two-pot caliper didn't distinguish itself as bad or good, which I guess
can be both bad and good.
Just to dispense with the
remaining poopy bits, the sidestand is grossly long and awkward. The
crank sensor had a minor gasket leak and
the mirrors are kind of unusable if the bike is running. Also, a bolt
fell out of the one of the ignition coil mounts.
In the all important appearance
department, the bike generated a lot of talk. With the unusual matte
finish, the unique motor configuration and non-cookie cutter bodywork,
I got a thumbs up from a natty Bay Street type' on, well, Bay
Street as well as from a scary 'How much fer yer daughter?' type in
a dump truck.
So, to bring this thread
to some conclusion, although I initially thought the bike looked tame,
it's all in the riding though folks, and this thing was fun, fun, fun.
If the brakes were on par with the handling and power (maybe better
pads?), and the quality control was bumped up a notch, it would make
an excellent all-rounder.
Some additional
detailed shots ...
|
|
|
|
Overhead.
|
Gauges!
|
Arse
end.
|
Ludicrously
long sidestand.
|
|